So instead, I’ve opted for the one with the most comfortable interface, and that is Zettlr. The differences appear in how they show those links to me – Obsidian and Logseq show network graphs, and Zettlr just shows backlinks.Īs much I think the graphs are cool, I don’t really see much value in them in my day-to-day. They also allow for easy octothorpe (#) tagging. What was missing in the middle – the Markdown phase – was linking between notes as well as tagging, which is why I’m trying out Obsidian/Zettlr/Logseq in the first place.Īll three of them do wiki-style linking between Markdown files. I take notes on things in Zotero, I jot down thoughts in Markdown (previously in the aforementioned RedNoteBook), and then I synthesize the lot in Libreoffice with the Zotero plugin.
#ZETTLR REVIEW HOW TO#
If you start searching those terms, be prepared for lengthy manifestos about how to take notes.Īs for me, I guess I’m keeping it simple. As its name implies, Zettlr is inspired by the “Zettlekasten” method of Niklas Luhmann. Logseq is based on “block-level” linking, which itself builds on RemNote. Obsidian in particular has a lot of fans on Youtube (e.g., this video), who share their complex workflows and talk about how network graphs reveal new ways of thinking. Moreover, I get the sense that all of them have some very zealous adherents. I thought about writing up comparisons between these systems, but I think those sorts of posts abound – just DuckDuckGo “obsidian vs zettlr” or “zettlr vs logseq” and you’ll see what I mean.
In fact, I have all three installed and may hop between them. However, given what these projects are doing, I do not feel locked into my choice. It meets my needs quite well, which are probably a bit more minimal than people might expect. So, I have tried both Zettlr and Obsidian – and I also tried a third system, Logseq – and have decided to adopt Zettlr. I was hoping to streamline blogging, note-taking, and other Markdown tasks in one system.
I use it regularly to plan my weeks, I obviously use it for this blog (which is a static Jekyll site), and I started using it to jot down ideas in a journaling program called RedNoteBook. I asked because I’m using Markdown more and more. Both are Markdown editors which also provide valuable features on top, including linking together Markdown notes and varying degrees of Zotero support. Create markdown-backed Kanban boards in Obsidian.About a week ago, I took to my home Mastodon instance, scholar.social, and asked whether people preferred Zettlr or Obsidian. Community plugins list, theme list, and releases of Obsidian. Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, cite, and share your research sources. Build your personal knowledge base with Trilium Notes 📝A simple and elegant markdown editor, available for Linux, macOS and Windows. Use it to organize your todo list, to write your journals, or to record your unique life. A local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
#ZETTLR REVIEW PDF#
A command line python script to convert Obsidian md files to a pdf Rust library and CLI to export an Obsidian vault to regular Markdown When comparing obsidian-pandoc and Zettlr you can also consider the following projects:
0 kommentar(er)
